Anca-Maria Popară-Voica1,2, Andreea Călin1,2, Bogdan Alexandru Popescu1,2, Ana Maria Mitrică3, Rodica Anghel1,3, Ruxandra Jurcuț1,2, Carmen Ginghină1,2
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy „Carol Davila”, Bucharest
2 Institute of Emergency for Cardiovascular Diseases „Prof. Dr. C.C. Iliescu”, Bucharest
3 Institute of Oncology „Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu”, Bucharest
Anca-Maria Popară-Voica, MD, PhD student
University of Medicine and Pharmacy „Carol Davila”, Bucharest
Institute of Emergency for Cardiovascular Diseases „Prof. Dr. C.C. Iliescu”, Bucharest
Sos. Fundeni 258, sector 2, 022328, Bucharest, Romania
Phone/Fax: +4021 3175227
e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Cancer Therapeutics–Related Cardiac Dysfunction (CTRCD) has become one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. If CTRCD is detected early, prompt administration of cardioprotective treatment may slow the progression of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and improve the prognosis. Thus, the management of patients with CTRCD should focus on early detection and prompt treatment. LV ejection fraction (EF) assessment by 2D TTE has a low sensitivity in detecting CTRCD at an early stage. There is much interest in the use of myocardial deformation parameters measured by tissue Doppler imaging or speckle tracking echocardiography to identify early myocardial injury and to anticipate ventricular dysfunction in patients receiving chemotherapy. Peak systolic global longitudinal strain (GLS) could be the most consistent parameter that correlates with the subsequent development of CTRCD. Serial monitoring of GLS seems the ideal strategy for the detection of subclinical LV dysfunction. A relative percentage reduction in GLS of >15% is very likely to be abnormal, whereas a change of <8% appears not to be of clinical significance. Determining the significance of these changes will require long-term follow-up. To better understand what defines CTRCD, more research and larger studies are needed and also a dynamic partnership between oncologists and cardiologists.
Keywords: Cancer Therapeutics–Related Cardiac Dysfunction, myocardial deformation parameters, speckle tracking echocardiography, peak systolic global longitudinal strain, early detection, early myocardial injury, anthracyclines, trastuzumab
Rezumat: Disfuncția cardiacă indusă de terapia antitumorală (CTRCD) reprezintă una din cele mai frecvente cauze de morbiditate și mortalitate în rândul supraviețuitorilor unei neoplazii. Dacă CTRCD este diagnosticată precoce, administrarea promptă a medicației cardioprotectoare poate încetini progresia disfuncției cardiace cu ameliorarea prognosticului. Managementul pacienților oncologici cu risc de CTRCD ar trebui așadar bazat pe diagnosticarea și tratarea precoce a CTRCD. Fracția de ejecție a ventriculului stâng (FEVS) evaluată prin ETT 2D are o sensibilitate redusă în depistarea precoce a CTRCD. Există un interes deosebit în utilizarea parametrilor de deformare miocardică, măsurați prin metodele de Doppler tisular sau speckle tracking, în identificarea precoce a injuriei miocardice induse de chimioterapie și în prezicerea instalării disfuncției cardiace. Strainul global longitudinal (SGL) pare să fie cel mai consistent parametru în acest sens și monitorizarea seriată a SGL poate reprezenta strategia ideală pentru depistarea precoce a disfuncției subclinice de VS. O reducere procentuală relativă a SGL >15% este foarte probabil să fie anormală, în timp ce o reducere <8% pare să nu aibă semnificație clinică. Semnificația acestor modificări necesită urmărire pe termen lung. Pentru a înțelege mai bine CTRCD sunt necesare ample eforturi de cercetare precum și dezvoltarea unei colaborări dinamice între cardiologi și oncologi.
Cuvinte cheie: disfuncția cardiacă indusă de terapia antitumorală, parametrii de deformare miocardică, ecocardiografie speckle tracking, strain global longitudinal, depistare precoce, injurie miocardică precoce, antracicline, trastuzumab
Breast cancer treatment has made significant advances in recent years1. The use of classic chemotherapy agents, such as anthracyclines, in combination with newer targeted agents, such as monoclonal antibodies, has contributed to the increase of overall survival in breast cancer patients2,3. Unfortunately, the cardiovascular side effects of the antineoplastic agents4,5 have made cardiac toxicity induced by chemotherapy to become one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in breast cancer survivors6. In patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) from cancer treatment, the mortality rate has been reported to be as high as 60% at two years7,8. Therefore, cardiotoxicity induced by cancer therapy has become a matter of great concern and the subject of many research efforts.
Cardiac toxicity induced by chemotherapy includes a broad spectrum of manifestations that range from cardiac dysfunction and HF to arterial hypertension, myocardial ischemia, thromboembolic events, arrhythmia and QT interval prolongation. This is why the National Cancer Institute refers to cardiotoxicity caused by antineoplastic agents in a general manner, as „toxicity that affects the heart”9. However, the term cardiotoxicity is usually used in reference to cardiac dysfunction and symptomatic HF, which are the most severe and best studied cardiac side effects of chemotherapy. An Expert Consensus Statement, endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, was recently published and a more precise term, Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiac Dysfunction (CTRCD) was introduced10, cardiotoxicity remaining a broader term.
Definition of CTRCD
Since the early 60’s, when cardiac dysfunction induced by anthracyclines was first reported, several definitions have been proposed, but a consensus definition lacked for many years11. Back then, the diagnosis was based on the presence of signs and symptoms of HF or the evidence of ultrastructural abnormalities on endomyocardial biopsies. Later, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) became the most used parameter for the diagnosis of cardiac dysfunction but with no clear cutoff values, which generated many difficulties with respect to diagnosis, monitoring and treatment-related decisions. The recently published Expert Consensus Statement finally provides a standardised definition of cardiac dysfunction induced by chemotherapy10. Cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is defined as a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction of >10%, to a value <53% (considered the normal reference value for two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE))10. This decrease in LVEF has to be confirmed by a reevaluation after 2-3 weeks since the first examination10. The document mentions that the reduction in LVEF can be symptomatic or asymptomatic. It also defines clear cutoff values for the concept of reversibility and classifies CTRCD accordingly10:
- Reversible: improvement in LVEF to within 5% of the baseline value10
- Partially reversible: improvement in LVEF by ≥10% from the lowest value but remaining >5% below the baseline value10
- Irreversible: improvement in LVEF by <10% from the lowest value and remaining >5% below the baseline value10
- Indeterminate: re-evaluation of patient not possible10.
Types of CTRCD
Amongst the various antineoplastic agents with potential cardiac toxicity, anthracyclines (including doxorubicin, epirubicin and idarubicin) and trastuzumab, have been most commonly implicated and best studied in breast cancer patients. The combined therapy, using agents from both these classes, generally increases the incidence of CTRCD12-14.
Based on their potential to cause irreversible versus reversible damage to the cardiovascular system, Ewer et al. have proposed a classification of anticancer agents, with anthracyclines being classified as type I and trastuzumab as type II15. This classification has extended into distinguishing two different types of cardiotoxicity16 in the larger acception of the term, and, by default, two types of CTRCD10.
Type I cardiotoxicity is related to the classic chemotherapy agents (anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, alkylating agents, antimicrotubule agents, antimetabolites) and has as prototype the toxicity induced by anthracyclines16-18. Type I chemotherapy agents are, usually, cytotoxic, inducing cell loss (necrosis/apoptosis) which leads to progressive and largely irreversible cardiovascular damage associated with increased rates of cardiovascular mortality16-18. It was shown that these agents induce ultrastructural damage (vacuoles, myofibrillar disarray and dropout, necrosis) on endomyocardial biopsies and also release of myocardial injury markers (troponins), as consequence of myocyte damage and loss8,10,16,19. Moreover, there is a definite relation between the cumulative dose of anthracyclines and the incidence of cardiac dysfunction, as described first by Von Hoff et al.8 and later, providing more accurate data, by Swain et al.20.
Conversely, type II cardiotoxicity is related to the newer targeted agents (anti-HER2, angiogenesis inhibitors, BCR-ABL inhibitors) and has as prototype the toxicity induced by trastuzumab16-18. Type II agents are cytostatic and do not induce cell loss, but cellular dysfunction (mitochondrial/protein dysfunction) which leads to temporary and largely reversible cardiac dysfunction, not associated with increased cardiovascular mortality16-18. There is no dose-dependent relation. Also, no apparent ultrastructural changes on endomyocardial biopsies have been described, though not thoroughly studied10.
This classification, however, has limitations. In patients with type I cardiotoxicity, clinical experience has shown that early detection of cardiac dysfunction and early administration of cardioprotective medications may improve LV systolic function19. In addition, trastuzumab, a type II drug, can trigger irreversible cardiac damage in patients with severe preexisting cardiac disease or it may potentiate the anthracycline type I CTRCD13. Moreover, as most of the newer targeted agents were introduced in oncology in the last two decades, their lack of long-term cardiac toxicity needs to be confirmed in the following years.
Anthracycline-induced type I CTRCD
Based on the time of onset and the duration of symptoms, anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity has been categorized into acute, early-onset and late-onset chronic progressive13. Acute cardiotoxic events are relatively rare (<1% of patients), dose-independent and are, usually, observed from the beginning of treatment and up to 14 days after it ends13,17. With few exceptions, they are transient, usually resolving within one to two weeks13,17. They comprise sudden ventricular repolarization alterations, changes in QT interval, ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, acute coronary syndromes, pericarditis and myocarditis3,21,22. Chronic CTRCD is dose-dependent, and more prevalent than the acute form: 1.6-5% of symptomatic HF patients during long-term follow-up 13 and up to 40% of asymptomatic patients with LV dysfunction3,17,21. It may occur either in the first year after completion of chemotherapy (early–onset, 1.6% to 2.1%) or beyond the first year (late/delayed-onset, 1.6% to 5%)3,13,17,21,22. Reports show that up to 10-20 years may pass until late-onset CTRCD becomes clinically evident13. Both forms of chronic CTRCD typically present as dilated cardiomyopathy, which can be progressive. However, this classification was made in the early 1990s and is based on retrospective, small studies in childhood cancer survivors’ populations13. At present, there are no available prospective studies on long-term cardiac effects of anthracycline chemotherapy on adult populations13. Thus, the incidence and the timing of occurrence of anthracycline-induced CTRCD are not well defined13.
Genetic predisposition and other various risk factors (Table 1) influence the progression and degree of anthracycline-induced CTRCD. Among them, the total cumulative dose of anthracyclines is the most important13,21,23. The recommended maximum lifetime cumulative dose for doxorubicin is 400-550 mg/m2 but it seems that there is no completely safe dose13,24. Studies evaluating doxorubicin-induced CTRCD reported rates of 3-5% with 400 mg/m2, 7-26% at 550 mg/m2 and 18-48% at 700 mg/m2 8,20. Dose-limiting strategies reduce CTRCD. In breast cancer patients the currently doses of doxorubicin, used in combination with modern adjuvant therapy, are between 240 and 360 mg/m2 and are associated with a incidence of HF around 2%20. However, microscopic analysis shows myocardial damage even with doses of doxorubicin as low as 180 mg/m2 25. All risk factors are related to chronic CTRCD but not with the acute forms21,26,27.
Table 1. Risk factors associated with anthracycline-induced CTRCD
|Younger/ older age|
|Rapid intravenous injection|
|Cumulative dose exceeding:|
|Daunorubicin 550-800 mg/m2|
|Doxorubicin 400-550 mg/m2|
|Epirubicin 900-1000 mg/m2|
|Idarubicin 150-225 mg/m2|
|Early mediastinal radiation, or concomitant doxorubicin exceeding a cumulative dose of 450 mg/m2|
|Hypertension, coronary artery disease|
|Electrolyte disturbances: hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia|
|Adapted from 21.|
The exact pathophysiological mechanism for anthracycline-induced CTRCD is still not clearly defined. It is known that topoisomerase 2 (Top2) represents the molecular target of anthracyclines28,29. Top2 is essential in modulating deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) structure during transcription; replication and recombination28,30. It has been shown that humans express two Top2 isoenzymes, namely Top2α and Top 2β28,31. Top2α is expressed in rapidly proliferating cells, such as the malignant cells, and it represents the primary target of the anticancer activity of the anthracyclines28. On the other hand, Top2β is expressed in quiescent cells and is the only Top2 isoenzyme expressed in the heart tissue28,32. Recent studies indicate that the Top2β isoenzyme is probably the target for the cardiac toxicity induced by anthracyclines28. In the heart tissue, anthracyclines bind to Top2β, with the formation of ternary complexes (Top2 β –anthracycline–DNA)10,28. These complexes lead to DNA double-stranded breaks and transcriptome changes which, in turn, activate the apoptotic pathway and also selectively affect oxidative phosphorylation, mitochondrial biogenesis, and the p53 pathway10,28. Through these main pathways: induction of cell apoptosis, reduction of adenosine triphosphate production from the mitochondria, and generation of reactive oxygen species, anthracyclines induce injury of cardiomyocytes28. The injury of myocytes progresses (myofibrillar disarray, necrosis and cell loss) with the increase of the cumulative dose of anthracyclines and finally leads to the death of cardiomyocytes28. The consequence is represented by a progressive decrease in the number of cardiomyocytes, leading to ventricular remodeling21,33. Studies using endomyocardial biopsy and troponin I measurements showed that cardiomyocyte injury may occur during or early after anthracycline exposure8,16,19. However, due to cardiac reserves and the activation of compensatory mechanisms, the clinical manifestations may become apparent after months to years from the initial exposure to anthracyclines16.
Trastuzumab – induced type II CTRCD
Trastuzumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, is used for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer patients. The HER2 gene is expressed in 25-30% of breast tumors and determines an overproduction of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)13. These tumors are considered very aggressive and have a worse prognosis13. The introduction of trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer has determined a 50% reduction in recurrence and a 33% increase in survival13,14,34.
The HER2 receptor is also expressed by the heart tissue and studies have shown that it plays an important role in the normal growth, repair and survival of cardiomyocytes35,36. Trastuzumab binds to the extracellular domain of HER2 and inhibits its signal transduction, thus, directly inhibiting the antiapoptotic signaling pathways and making cardiac dysfunction possible21. As previously described, cardiac dysfunction induced by trastuzumab has a better prognosis than that caused by anthracyclines, as it often occurs during treatment, is reversible in most cases and it is not associated with ultrastructural lesions on endomyocardial biopsy18,43. Also, trastuzumab rechallange after recovery of cardiac function is, usually, safe18.
The data from the pivotal and adjuvant trials on trastuzumab point out to the existence of an important anthracycline –trastuzumab interaction. It was observed that the most important risk factor for trastuzumab induced CTRCD is the association with high cumulative doses of anthracyclines (>300 mg/m2)21. It also seems that trastuzumab potentiates anthracyclines toxicity especially when the two drugs are given concurrently, or when the time interval between the administration of the two regimens is short. In the pivotal metastatic HER-2 positive clinical trial, in which trastuzumab was administered concurrently with anthracyclines, the incidence of cardiac toxicity was very high, cardiac dysfunction being reported in 27% of cases and NYHA III/IV HF in 16% of cases37,38. By contrast, in the adjuvant trastuzumab trials, in which trastuzumab and anthracyclines were given in a sequential manner, the reported incidence of cardiac dysfunction ranged from 3-18.1% and of NYHA class III–IV HF from 0-3.9%37,38. Among the adjuvant trials, the HERA trial, in which the time interval between the administration of the two regimens was the longest, reported the lowest incidence of HF37,38. Furthermore, when trastuzumab was given to patients who did not receive anthracyclines, the incidence of cardiac toxicity was even lower, such as in the third arm of the BCIRG 006 trial in which the incidence of cardiac dysfunction was of 8.6% and of NYHA class III–IV HF of 0.38%39.
There are some relevant aspects that may explain this anthracycline–trastuzumab interaction18. Trastuzumab is, usually, administered to patients who have already been exposed to anthracyclines, and whose heart tissue is, thus, „vulnerable” in response to the injury induced by anthracyclines18. It seems that following anthracyclines administration there is a HER 2 overexpression in the „vulnerable” myocardium, by which cell repair mechanisms are activated40-42. If trastuzumab is given during a time interval in which the myocardium is „vulnerable”, it will block the HER2 related cell repair and survival mechanisms and will potentiate and augment the injury induced by anthracyclines18. This is probably why, in some patients with a history of recent exposure to anthracyclines, trastuzumab may promote an irreversible cardiac dysfunction18.
Other risk factors for trastuzumab induced CTRCD are pre-existing LV dysfunction or systemic arterial hypertension, a body mass index >25 and advanced age13,21. Chest radiotherapy associated with trastuzumab seems to be clinically safe21,34. Recent evidence shows a higher incidence of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects in cancer patients aged over 70, with a history of heart disease and/or diabetes21,44.
Early detection of CTRCD using echocardiography
It has been shown that symptoms of CTRCD often become clinically apparent only after irreversible myocardial damage has occurred10. Also, if diagnosed late in its course, HF due to CTRCD is often resistant to therapy10. By contrast, if CTRCD is detected early, prompt administration of HF treatments may slow the progression of LV dysfunction or prevent the development of late CTRCD3. Moreover, anticancer drug combinations could be modified as to reduce further cardiac damage3. Thus, the management of patients with CTRCD should focus on early detection and prompt treatment.
So far, early detection of CTRCD was mainly based on serial cardiac imaging to identify asymptomatic reductions in LVEF. Two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the most commonly used method in this setting. However, LVEF assessment by 2D TTE has a low sensitivity in detecting CTRCD at an early stage, due to some significant limitations: it presents technique-related variability45; it reflects global function and it does not detect subtle regional changes10,22,46; it may be affected by changes in loading conditions10; and also, the reduction in LVEF is often a late phenomenon, occurring only after a critical amount of myocardial damage has taken place19,45,47-50.
Growing attention is being paid in defining markers of early myocardial changes that can predict subsequent LVEF reduction or the progression to HF. This would allow the early identification of patients at high risk for developing significant LV dysfunction and the initiation of prevention strategies by using targeted monitoring, as well as the possibility, to introduce cardio-protective medications45.
There is much interest in the use of myocardial deformation parameters measured by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) or speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) to identify early myocardial injury and to anticipate ventricular dysfunction in patients receiving chemotherapy45,51. The advantages of these parameters include the possibility to detect regional abnormalities in LV function, their improved reproducibility and their reported ability to predict subsequent LV dysfunction10,45.
It has been shown that the reduction of myocardial deformation parameters is an early sign of subclinical myocardial damage induced by chemotherapy, and occurs before any reduction in LVEF as assessed by conventional 2D TTE10,13,22,45,51,52. It has also been reported that reductions of myocardial deformation parameters correlate with subsequent LVEF reduction or the development of HF, which represents the real value of these parameters10. Earlier studies focused on TDI-based strain parameters, among which interventricular septal peak systolic longitudinal strain rate was reported to be the most consistent in detecting the early myocardial changes during chemotherapy45. Recent studies use 2D STE to measure different myocardial deformation parameters (strain, strain-rate and twist). Among them peak systolic global longitudinal strain (GLS) is significantly related to the subsequent development of CTRCD10,45. Because of baseline variability in strain values between different patients, it has been shown that the within-patient change of STE-GLS is a more reliable parameter compared to a population-derived absolute cut-off value10,45,54. Although the cut-off value for within-patient change in STE-GLS that predicts CTRCD is not clear, it has been reported that values between 11-15% appear to have the best specificity10,45,54. In patients where a relative change in GLS is unavailable, absolute levels of GLS > -19% and -20.5%, early during chemotherapy, have been associated with CTRCD45,53,54. In contrast, neither global radial strain nor global circumferential strain proved consistently predictive of CTRCD45,53,54.
The recently published Expert Consensus Statement recommends the serial monitoring of GLS as the ideal strategy for the detection of subclinical LV dysfunction10. GLS assessed during chemotherapy should be compared with the one measured at baseline, and the within-patient change in STE-GLS should be noted10. The authors mention that the relative percentage reduction in GLS of >15% is very likely to be abnormal, whereas a change of <8% appears not to be of clinical significance10. Also, it is recommended to confirm the abnormal value of GLS by a repeat study that should be performed two to three weeks after the initial abnormal study10.
Advances in breast cancer treatment and the subsequent increase in disease-free survival have led to an increase of cardiac complications induced by cancer therapy. As overt HF induced by chemotherapy has such a worse prognosis, there is a stringent need to improve our ability to detect CTRCD at a subclinical level. Echocardiography has a major role in this setting, with evidence supporting the use of myocardial deformation parameters measured by 2D-STE in detecting the subclinical CTRCD. Among them, STE-GLS seems to be the most consistent parameter that correlates with the subsequent development of CTRCD. The serial monitoring of STE-GLS has been included in the assessment and monitoring of cardiac function in cancer patients as the ideal strategy for the detection of subclinical LV dysfunction. Determining the significance of these changes will require long-term follow-up before GLS may be used in treatment related-decisions. To better understand what defines CTRCD, more research and larger studies are needed and also a dynamic partnership between oncologists and cardiologists.
Acknowledgement: This paper is supported by the Sectorial Operational Programme Human Resources Developement (SOP HRD), financed from the European Social Fund and by the Romanian Government under the contract number POSDRU/159/1.5/S/137390.
1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61:69–90
2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62(1):10–29
3. Tan TC, Scherrer-Crosbie M. Assessing the Cardiac Toxicity of Chemotherapeutic Agents: Role of Echocardiography. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 2012; 5(6):403–409.
4. Minami M, Matsumoto S, Horiuchi H. Cardiovascular side-effects of modern cancer therapy. Circ J. 2010; 74:1779-86
5. Yeh ET, Bickford CL. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53:2231-47
6. Hooning MJ, Botma A, Aleman BM, et al. Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease in 10-year survivors of breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007; 99:365-75
7. Felker GM, Thompson RE, Hare JM, et al. Underlying causes and long-term survival in patients with initially unexplained cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1077-84
8. Von Hoff DD, Layard MW, Basa P, Davis HL, Von Hoff AL, Rozencweig M, et al. Risk Factors for Doxorubicin-lnduced Congestive Heart Failure. Ann Intern Med. 1979;91:710-717. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-91-5-710
10. Plana JC, Galderisi M, Barac A, et al. Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27:911-39
11. Khouri MG, Douglas PS, Mackey JR et al. Cancer therapy-induced cardiac toxicity in early breast cancer: addressing the unresolved issues. Circulation 2012;126:2749-63
12. Seidman A, Hudis C, Pierri MK et al. Cardiac dysfunction in the trastuzumab clinical trials experience. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1215-21
13. Curigliano G, Cardinale D, Suter T, Plataniotis G, de Azambuja E, Sandri M T, Criscitiello G C, Goldhirsch A, Cipolla C, Roila F, on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Cardiovascular toxicity induced by chemotherapy, targeted agents and radiotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Annals of Oncology 23 (Supplement 7): vii155–vii166, 2012.
14. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 2001;344:783-92
15. Ewer MS, Vooletich MT, Durand JB, Woods ML, Davis JR, Valero V, Lenihan DJ. Reversibility of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity: new insights based on clinical course and response to medical treatment. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7820-7826. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.13.300.
16. Suter TM, Ewer MS. Cancer drugs and the heart: importance and management. Eur Heart J. 2012
17. Yeh ET, Bickford CL. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: incidence, pathogenesis,diagnosis, and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53(24):2231–2247
18. Ewer MS, Ewer SM. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: what the cardiologist needs to know. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:564-75
19. Cardinale D, Colombo A, Lamantia G, Colombo N, Civelli M, De Giacomi G et al. Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy: clinical relevance and response to pharmacologic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:213–20
20. Swain SM, Whaley FS, Ewer MS. Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin: a retrospective analysis of three trials. Cancer 2003; 97:2869–79
21. Adãoa R, Keulenaerb G, Leite-Moreiraa A, Brás-Silvaa C. Cardiotoxicity associated with cancer therapy: Pathophysiology and prevention. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013;32(5):395-409
22. Florescu M, Cinteza M, Vinereanu D. Chemotherapy-induced Cardiotoxicity. Maedica – a Journal of Clinical Medicine 2013; 8(1): 59-67
23. Ryberg M, Nielsen D, Skovsgaard T, et al. Epirubicin cardiotoxicity: an analysis of 469 patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:3502-8
24. Lipshultz SE, Lipsitz SR, Sallan SE, et al. Chronic progressive cardiac dysfunction years after doxorubicin therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2629-36
25. Friedman MA, Bozdech MJ, Billingham ME, Rider AK. Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Serial endomyocardial biopsies and systolic time intervals. JAMA 1978;240:1603–6
26. Hortobagyi GN, Frye D, Buzdar AU, et al. Decreased cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin administered by continuous intravenous infusion in combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1989;63:37-45
27. Raschi E, Vasina V, Ursino MG, et al. Anticancer drugs and cardiotoxicity: insights and perspectives in the era of targeted therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;125:196-218
28. Vejpongsa, P., & Yeh, E. T. (2013). Topoisomerase 2β: A Promising Molecular Target for Primary Prevention of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 95(1), 45-52.
29. Tewey, K.M., Rowe, T.C., Yang, L., Halligan, B.D. & Liu, L.F. Adriamycin-induced DNA damage mediated by mammalian DNA topoisomerase II. Science 226, 466–468 (1984).
30. Liu, L.F. & Wang, J.C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 7024–7027 (1987).
31. Drake, F.H. et al. Purification of topoisomerase II from amsacrine-resistant P388 leukemia cells. Evidence for two forms of the enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 16739–16747 (1987).
32. Capranico, G., Tinelli, S., Austin, C.A., Fisher, M.L. & Zunino, F. Different patterns of gene expression of topoisomerase II isoforms in differentiated tissues during murine development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1132, 43–48 (1992).
33. Sawyer DB, Peng X, Chen B, et al. Mechanisms of anthracycline cardiac injury: can we identify strategies for cardioprotection? Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;53:105-13
34. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1659-72
35. Lee KF, Simon H, Chen H, et al. Requirement for neuregulin receptor erbB2 in neural and cardiac development. Nature. 1995;378:394-8
36. Zhao YY, Sawyer DR, Baliga RR, et al. Neuregulins promote survival and growth of cardiac myocytes. Persistence of ErbB2 and ErbB4 expression in neonatal and adult ventricular myocytes. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:10261-9
37. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med344:783–792
38. de Azambuja E, Bedard PL, Suter T, Piccart-Gebhart M. Cardiac toxicity with anti-HER-2 therapies-what have we learned so far?. Targ Oncol (2009) 4:77–88
39. Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Bono P et al (2006) Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 354:809–820
40. Zhao, Y. Y. et al. Neuregulins promote survival and growth of cardiac myocytes. Persistence of ErbB2 and ErbB4 expression in neonatal and adult ventricular myocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 273,10261–10269 (1998).
41. Crone, S. A. et al. ErbB2 is essential in the prevention of dilated cardiomyopathy. Nat. Med.8, 459–465 (2002).
42. de Korte, M. A. et al. 111 Indium-trastuzumab visualises myocardial human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression shortly after anthracycline treatment but not during heart failure: a clue to uncover the mechanisms of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity. Eur. J. Cancer 43, 2046–2051 (2007).
43. Procter M, Suter TM, de Azambuja E, Dafni U, van Dooren V, Muehlbauer S, Climent MA, Rechberger E, Liu WT, Toi M, Coombes RC, Dodwell D, Pagani O, Madrid J, Hall M, Chen SC, Focan C, Muschol M, van Veldhuisen DJ, Piccart-Gebhart MJ. Longer-term assessment of trastuzumab-related cardiac adverse events in the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3422-8.
44. Serrano C, Cortés J, de Mattos-Arruda L, et al. Trastuzumab related cardiotoxicity in the elderly: a role for cardiovascular risk factors. Ann Oncol. 2011;23:897-902
45. Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F, Lim K-D, Plana JC, Woo A, Marwick TH, Useof Myocardial Strain Imaging by Echocardiography for the Early Detection of Cardiotoxicity in Patients During and After Cancer Chemotherapy – A Systematic Review, Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.073
46. Malm S, Frigstad S, Sagberg E, Larsson H, Skjaerpe T. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1030–5
47. Cardinale D, Colombo A, Torrisi R et al. Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity: clinical and prognostic implications of troponin I evaluation. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3910-6.
48. Fallah-Rad N, Lytwyn M, Fang T, Kirkpatrick I, Jassal DS. Delayed contrast enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in trastuzumab induced cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10:5.
49. Telli ML, Hunt SA, Carlson RW, Guardino AE. Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity: calling into question the concept of reversibility. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3525-33.
50. Wadhwa D, Fallah-Rad N, Grenier D et al. Trastuzumab mediated cardiotoxicity in the setting of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study. Breast cancer research and treatment 2009;117:357-64.
51. Florescu M, Magda LS, Enescu OA, Jinga D, Vinereanu D. Early detection of epirubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Jan;27(1):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
52. Jurcuț R, Wildiers H, Ganame J, D’Hooge J, De Backer J, Denys H et al. Strain rate imaging detects early cardiac effects of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with breast cancer. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:1283–9
53. Sawaya H, Sebag IA, Plana JC et al. Assessment of echocardiography and biomarkers for the extended prediction of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:596-603.
54. Negishi K, Negishi T, Hare JL, Haluska BA, Plana JC, Marwick TH. Independent and incremental value of deformation indices for prediction of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:493-8.